| It wasn't that long ago that free email accounts | | | | anything is |
| were so totallytaken for granted that everyone | | | | I have used this service many times and have had |
| seemed to have several of them. Iremember | | | | goodluck. Their free version is fast, easy to use and |
| personally owning dozens of Yahoo!, AltaVista, | | | | simple, althoughthey do charge extra for POP3 |
| Mail.comand Hotmail accounts (among any others), | | | | access. I like their web based mailsystem, although |
| each with their ownspecial purpose. | | | | their free service does require advertisements. |
| Even the internet marketing books recommended | | | | You can eliminate these advertisements for less than |
| having several freeemail accounts for promotional | | | | $10 per yearif you so desire. |
| activities. You see, many "free"advertising-related | | | | Everyone.Net |
| activities require an email address so thatspam can | | | | Personally, I love the service provided by |
| be sent. The exchange is you get a little | | | | Everyone.net. Forabout $40 a year, you get your |
| freeadvertising and you agree to receive some | | | | own domain name and tenfull-featured POP3 email |
| useless, sillypromotional messages. You cannot just | | | | accounts. You can use your own emailprogram |
| put in a fake email addressas this would be detected, | | | | (Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora or whatever you |
| so typically you would create a freeemail account | | | | prefer)or you can read your messages on the web |
| just for the purpose. Who cares how many | | | | using a simple interface. |
| messagesget set to an account which will never be | | | | Everyone.Net also has a very simple filtering |
| read? | | | | capability, which |
| This, of course, violated the purpose of free email | | | | I've found is great for getting rid of the spam. This |
| accounts,which is to display banner and other | | | | service isperfect for someone who needs a lot of |
| advertisements as peopleread their email messages | | | | email accounts without anyeffort, perhaps for a |
| (many of these free accounts also sendspam | | | | family or group of friends. |
| messages of their own to their subscribers as well). | | | | Purchase a Domain Name and Forward Your Email |
| Tons ofmail dumped into accounts which are never | | | | James S. Huggins wrote an article which explains in |
| read generate no moneyfor the email services. | | | | detail how topurchase a domain and forward email |
| Nonetheless, in the heyday of the free accounts this | | | | from that domain to your |
| was a minorinconvenience. Ah, those were the days, | | | | ISP's account. The concept is as follows: |
| when businesses would paymajor dollars for banners! | | | | - You purchase a domain for about $9.00 a year |
| In fact, in an even greater perversion of this | | | | from a registrarwhich allows for email forwarding. |
| phenomenon, a fewemail services popped up which | | | | NameCheap is one of these. |
| actually paid for people to reademail messages. I | | | | Let's say you registered "johnsmith.com" |
| don't mean those "services" which paid to sendyou | | | | - Park the web site on their server. This presents a |
| email messages from advertisers; no, I mean you got | | | | single pagewhich says the site is under construction. |
| paid asmall amount for every single message, | | | | - Use the NameCheap system to forward all email to |
| regardless of who it wasfrom, that you read in the | | | | "" to your own personal ISP emailaccount. |
| web-based email client. The conceptwas that | | | | What is the advantage of this? Since everyone will |
| advertisers would pay for you to look at the banner | | | | be sendingemail to , you can change ISP's all |
| adsthat displayed at the same time as the messages. | | | | youwant. You don't have to worry about changing |
| It was even touted among the "experts" that the | | | | your email address -you only have to change the one |
| free emailservices such as Hotmail was an incredible | | | | forwarding address. |
| thing called viralmarketing. The concept here was that | | | | Purchase web Hosting |
| every message you send usingthe service has a link | | | | Contrary to popular belief, paid web hosting is not |
| to join the service. This gives everysingle person who | | | | veryexpensive. In fact, all but the very worst paid |
| reads a message a chance (and often manychances) | | | | hosting servicesprovide far superior service and |
| to join themselves. Millions (and perhaps tens | | | | features than the best free host. |
| ofmillions) took advantage of these offers. | | | | One of the features that is provided with many paid |
| Of course all of this failed to take into account a | | | | hostingservices is a number of POP3 accounts. You |
| very basicfact: it really doesn't matter how many | | | | can use these foryour own email account as well. |
| people use the service ifmoney is not being made. In | | | | Other Alternatives |
| fact this proved very true when theinternet bubble | | | | Believe me, I do understand that companies on the |
| burst; more users suddenly meant more money | | | | internet needto make a profit. I also know that many |
| beinglost. | | | | companies which offeredfree services are struggling |
| The long overdue death of the banner ad as a viable | | | | with what to do about the failure ofthe banner ad |
| means ofpromotion foreshadowed the failure of | | | | and internet advertising in general. |
| many internet businesses. | | | | I firmly believe that the "advertising supported" |
| Those with exceptionally poor business models, such | | | | concept on theinternet is basically flawed, unethical |
| as | | | | and simply does not work. |
| AllAdvantage, fell fast. These were soon followed by | | | | People should pay for whatever services they use at |
| the merelyidiotic (such as TheVines), the grandiose | | | | a reasonablerate. The concept of having someone |
| (such as Kozmos and | | | | else pay for the service inorder to display advertising |
| WebVan) and the merely poorly financed (most of | | | | tends to distance the user (the website or email |
| the internetcompanies). | | | | user) from the vendor (the free mail |
| The inevitable is finally catching up with the world of | | | | provider)because the customer is actually the |
| free emailservices. These days the announcements | | | | advertiser and not the user. |
| seem to be coming almostdaily from all of the major | | | | This results in poor service and oftentimes a |
| services: Yahoo, Hotmail, Mail.comand Altavista. They | | | | complete lack ofresponsibility for the actual users of |
| are either attempting to force their usersinto paid | | | | the services. |
| services or are closing down entirely. | | | | However, some of the larger, more traditional free |
| Many of these services are finding that they can | | | | emailproviders have habitually offered horrible (at |
| survive byproviding free basic accounts with extra | | | | best) customerservice and have proven time and |
| charges for "special"features. The most common | | | | again that they could not careless about their users. |
| "extra feature" is POP3 access (meaningreading email | | | | These companies have come up with businessmodels |
| from your email client). The rationale is the | | | | that simply did not work and built tremendous |
| freeservice cannot make money from POP3 | | | | organizationson top of those models. |
| accounts as no advertisementsare shown. This is, of | | | | By purchasing the new pay services from these |
| course, a very weak argument because theservices | | | | companies, you willget the same horrible customer |
| do place ads in the email messages. | | | | service and lack of care (becausethese are the same |
| Another common "extra cost feature" is large | | | | organizations), only now you will be paying tobe |
| attachments. Thefree email services seem to believe | | | | abused. |
| that only a small percentageof people use | | | | The final and perhaps most important argument |
| attachments of over, say, a few hundred kilobytes | | | | against givingmoney to these previously free services |
| toa few megabytes. They reason that if this is | | | | is they tend towards theextraordinarily expensive |
| desired the users canpay extra. | | | | side when compared with the alternatives. |
| The problem is, well, that most of these free email | | | | The only advantage to staying with one of these |
| services areworth exactly what they cost: nothing. | | | | free services (asfar as I can see) is you won't have |
| Free email services arefat, dumb and lazy. If you | | | | to change. And sometimes, myfriends, change is a |
| don't believe me, just try gettingcustomer support! | | | | good thing. |
| Their paid versions will almost certainly not beany | | | | Additional Reading |
| better, and it appears to me to be exceptionally | | | | Own Your Own Email Address |
| overpricedas well. | | | | An excellent article by James S. Huggins about how |
| So what are the alternatives? | | | | to purchase adomain name and create forwarding |
| One of the few free email services that is worth | | | | addresses. |