| We are faced with a situation where pranksters | | | | social network websites on the internet. They both |
| change their real identities each time they send scam | | | | control the databases of majority of internet users |
| e-mails to people. Experience has shown that the | | | | who register on social network sites. This is an |
| e-mail id sometimes does not carry the name of the | | | | obvious target for anyone who wants to lookup |
| owner of the account. That means that you must | | | | email address. You can carry out a trace through two |
| expand the scope of your search beyond always | | | | different methods on Facebook; you can enter the |
| looking at the id. Some of the places you can lookup | | | | name of an individual to find him, and you can choose |
| email address are; Google, Bing, Facebook, Twitter, | | | | to use the e-mail id. Though, you are limited to |
| and reverse email lookup. Why would a prankster | | | | whatever information contained in their database, the |
| want to coin his e-mail address from his name? He | | | | potential of getting a report is till there. If the |
| has so many e-mail addresses, with one bearing an id | | | | prankster belongs to any of the social network sites, |
| different from another. | | | | his name will definitely be displayed. However, what |
| Let us take a look at Google and Bing as two of the | | | | happens if the individual you are looking for is not a |
| many search engines you can use when you need | | | | member of a social network site? The best thing to |
| information on any e-mail sender. They both have | | | | do is to use a reverse email search service to locate |
| similar methods in terms of searching for information. | | | | him. |
| Key in the electronic mail of the sender and click the | | | | A reverse email search service is a simple, but very |
| search key. You can be sure of getting thousands of | | | | effective way to lookup email address without |
| identical names and other information when the | | | | worrying about the problems of the two methods |
| results are displayed. There lies the major problem | | | | mentioned earlier. You can be very certain that any |
| with a search engine; you want just a detailed report | | | | report obtained through this method is very current |
| about one person, but it provides thousands of | | | | and correct. You can begin to find someone as soon |
| names and addresses for you to choose from. | | | | as you are registered with anyone of your choice. |
| Maybe for some other information you could use a | | | | There are a couple of websites where you can trace |
| search engine, definitely not to lookup email | | | | someone without paying a cent, but this is not |
| addresses. Even when you are lucky to find the | | | | always a good option. Using a site that offers you a |
| name of the sender, you still have to deal with | | | | free use of its services only narrows the kind of |
| problem of old database. | | | | information you can get. It also affects the quality |
| Facebook and Twitter are among the two largest | | | | and reliability of the report. |